|
|
|
|
|
| To whom do we tell our dreams?
A chi vanno raccontati i sogni? in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 3, 2006
To whom do we tell our dreams? Ferenczi's theory is sufficiently well known a propos of this. We tell our dreams to those to whom the dreams refer. Freud considered that dreams were egocentric, bound to the ego of the dreamer. Nonetheless, since Freud's time, Laplanche - among others - has pointed out the communicative element of dreams. In Hebrew mystical literature (Zohar) we read that the dreamer must tell his dreams exclusively to the person who loves him - a thesis which introduces the question as to the manner in which dreams find their place in the analytical setting. And it is precisely with this that this article deals: a dreamer (the patient), who recounts his dream and a psychotherapist (the one who listens), who must prove himself worthy of that narration - a situation in which what is at stake is precisely the person of the psychotherapist, and not only his interpretative capacity.
|
Television
Televisione, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 4, 2007
The medium is the message. With television, the viewer is the screen. Television is the most spectacular extension of our central nervous system. This well-known concept of McLuhan’s is here examined in the light of religion (Genesis, orphic mythology, the Gospel according to St. John, the cabalist Luria), philosophy (Democritus, Aristotle, Al Kindi, Ibn Arabi), and psychoanalysis. The attempt here being establishing the significance of “seeing”, “medium”, and “screen”, concepts which retain something of the unforeseen, the unexpected. As regards “seeing”, reference is made to two poets fairly representative of Western tradition -- Cavalcanti and Wordsworth, and the classic work of the latter, “I wandered lonely as a cloud”, is analyzed. As regards the “medium”, attention is focused on the studies of Bergson of the Aristotelian concept of “place”. And, finally, as regards “screen”, the psychoanalytical constructions of “setting” and “dream screen” are redefined. The result of this re-visitation is the paradox of a place, the medium of television, which precedes the homo videns. And it is that paradox which constitutes the fulcrum, or heart, of this article.
|
Das erlösende Wort, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 5, 2007
Wittgenstein’s statement that philosophy attempts to discover the liberating word (das erlösende Wort) that is, the word which permits us finally to conceive or comprehend that which has up to then weighed, ever elusive, on our consciousness constitutes the leit motif of this article. That concept is commented on and interpreted in the light of what occurs in the analytical setting and in relation to the existing relationships between philosophy, psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. The psychotherapist, no less than the philosopher, attempts to discover the word which liberates. It is a matter of establishing what the object of that liberation is. What does the liberating word liberate? That word liberates place. But how does this occur? By transcending confines. The article then places in discussion the opacity of the term consciousness itself, both as it appears in Wittgenstein’s text, as well as its consideration in psychoanalysis. Thus, the liberating word liberates consciousness, while remaining however within consciousness. Finally, on the basis of Heidegger’s consideration, Wittgenstein’s statement contributes to liberating the sense of the choice made in Freud’s time to call the new discipline he invented “psychoanalysis”.
|
Psycho-philosophical Genealogical Sketches, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 6, 2008
These genealogies concern the history or, one might say, the recounting of the difficult and controversial relationships between philosophy and psychoanalysis, beginning with the invention itself of the term “psychology” (an invention, incidentally, produced by a philosopher) up to the present. Reference is made to Montaigne, Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Kant, Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, Freud, Jung, Sartre and Lacan, the phenomenological-existential psychotherapies and, lastly, philosophical counselling. The history is also illustrated by its fundamental nexus: Cartesianism, as recognized by Foucault, the invention of the unconscious, the invention of psychoanalysis, the moving away from philosophy by Freud, the moving away of philosophy and philosophical counselling from therapy. The questions which subsequently arise and which appear impervious to any satisfactory responses are: what do philosophers, psychoanalysts, philosophical counsellors really want? What is there at the basis of their controversy? At the basis of their anxiety of influence?
|
Mythical-Literature on the Object of Value
Mitoletteratura dell'oggetto di valore, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 7, 2008
This article addresses the subject of image, signifier and object of value. Before money, there is value and an object which signifies it, creating a trajectory. The Anima, as Xenocrates asserts, is the number which moves autonomously and the images are its signifiers. The objects of value are here re-examined in their two-fold nature, correlated in particular in mythology and literature. Protagonists here become tripods and rings, necklaces, and golden apples, shields and veils, and embroidered handkerchiefs, crosses and angels, gardens and enchanted castles, forests and powerful cities, the Graal and ivory, Helen and Homer, Aeneas and Virgil, Jerusalem, Othello and Shakespeare, Leander and Rotrou, Kurtz and Conrad. The objects signify value following an inexorable path of trajectories not endowed with a real subject. On the one hand, the trajectories meander -- for the most part unnoticed, unrecognizable, and precisely for this reason even more disseminators of effects -- from a supposed origin not necessarily a precedence, and a dead supposition not necessarily implicit of an end. An excellent metaphor, this, of the practice of analysis, in the sense that it illuminates what occurs in the analytical setting: a défilé of numbers which move autonomously.
|
Intuition, Intention, Inspiration, Insetting
Intuizione, intenzione, inspirazione, insetting, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 8, 2009
A discourse on art could be compared to a discourse on psychotherapy. Thus said, the logical conclusion would be that it is also a discourse on the intuition, inspiration and intention with which the therapeutic setting is imbued, and which invisibly guide both patient and therapist. By the term ‘insetting’ -- introduced in this discourse is meant the superimposition of one space over another, the insetting space over the space of the setting. That superimposition, which produces the contentment of doing analysis, is placed in relation on the one hand to elements of psychoanalysis (synchronism, transcendent function), and on the other to Heidegger’s approach to art. While for the philosopher the World is based on the Earth and the Earth emerges through the World, for the psychotherapist the setting is based on the insetting and the insetting arises from the setting. Psychologists and philosophers apart, however, it is writers and -- in particular, poets -- who guide the discourse on intuition, intention, inspiration and insetting, beginning with their reflections on the creation of art.
|
Blood-analysis
Sanguanalisi, in Giornale Storico del Centro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 9, 2009
The history of psychoanalysis is re-examined in this article in the context of the substance, metaphor and mythology of blood. Seven kinds of transfusion of the analytical blood from one generation to another are illustrated: first of all, initial blood, the family saga, from the dawn of analysis; second, single blood, i.e., the analysts not descended from other analysts in other words, un-analyzed analysts; third, dual blood, the coniunctiones between analysts; fourth, quadruple blood, the maze of analytical relationships; fifth, suicide blood, analysts who take their own lives; sixth, migrant blood, analysts who go abroad; and seventh, blissful blood, the final destination the will to create new progeny.
|
Death before Death, Death where Love reigns
Morire prima di morire, morire dove regna Amore, in Giornale Storico del Cenro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 10, 2010
The experience of death will have a sense if it is comprehended during life, and not only at its conclusion. For the tragic hero, that comprehension coincides with the final exit, and examples of this can be found in the works of Shakespeare and in Conrad’s character, Kurtz, who at the end of his existence initially, an idealist, and finally a cruel profiteer and possibly a cannibal would appear to have comprehended the significance of (or lack of) his own life and that of western colonialism when he cries out: “the horror, the horror!” A similar reaction occurs when the Ego is confronted with death. The Ego is horrified by that confrontation and attempts to avoid it at any cost. It attempts to avoid it because the nature of death is perceived as final, and that finality is unbearable. The Ego is, by nature, unable to understand that death in itself does not know finality. It is not however with tragic heroes that this article deals. Rather, it is a search for a time or a state in which death can occur during life. Love is one of these times or states; although there are others. The point here is to understand that death is not anchored to one terminal point in life, but can be experienced in many forms during it. It is, in other words, a question of other forms of dying before death.
|
The astuteness of the Anima: sinning in order not to know
L’astuzia dell’Anima: peccare per non sapere, in Giornale Storico del Cenro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 11, 2010
What could be considered sin par excellence? According to traditional Christian theology, it would be that of agnosìa, a term often used by the Gnostics, meaning an unconscious or unwitting state. During the early Christian era, the Gnostics stigmatized that condition in the Christians. Jung later took up the Gnostic view in electing consciousness as the aim of each human being. However, it is precisely in the process of achieving this aim that the seeds of a lethal paradox ripen. During that process of becoming conscious there is a masked, malign intent of subtraction of the world, and if that subtraction is not fully realized it will be due to an astuteness of the Anima.
|
What is new about the Liber Novus?
Cos’è nuovo nel Liber Novus?, in Giornale Storico del Cenro Studi di Psicologia e Letteratura, nr 12, 2011
The term new is recurrent in the opus of the Gnostic master Marcione, as we are reminded by Harnack in relation to the revolution of Luther. Against Marcione, against his and others’ gnosticism, Christians protested and prevailed with their New Testament. Nietzsche, in his turn, speaks of new praxis, new men (the extraordinary men for whom everything is a game), of new beings, of the necessity of forming a new class, of the tree which is perennially new and also a new psychologist. Who is the new psychologist thought of by Nietzsche? The psychoanalyst, we are led to think, even though Nietzsche could not be aware of this. In fact, Ferenczi called psychoanalysis new psychology. Also, while on the heels of the long-lived influence of Gioacchino da Fiore the advent of a new age of the spirit was possible, Neumann conceived of a new ethic corresponding to this new age. However, in the end, exactly what did the Gnostics, Christians, Nietzsche, the psychoanalysts and Jung actually intend by new? And, above all: what is new in the Liber Novus?
|
|
|